Poll: Does Quack! really suck?

We’ve polled this one countless times, mostly informally, and the answer is always the same, “could be better.”

This time, 53% of the respondents thought that Quack could be better, 23% think it is the “Best. Thing. Ever” (don’t know what they’re smoking), and 23% saw a butterfly (definitely don’t know what they’re smoking).

From which we can reasonably conclude that 46% of those polled are smoking some strong stuff.

Does Quack! really suck?

Best. Thing. Ever. 23% of all votes
Could be better… 53% of all votes
Ooh look! A butterfly! 23% of all votes

Total Votes: 43 Started: February 1, 2007

Nevertheless, the majority (23 of 43 respondents) thinks that Quack! could be better, and we must respect the majority’s opinion. Which leads us to, just what is their opinion? Please leave your thoughts on just how Quack! could be better (and what you will do to make it better) in the comments below.

5 Replies to “Poll: Does Quack! really suck?”

  1. it’s 53.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
    33333333333333333333333333333333333333333 = 99.9999

    And please don’t ask me what became of the last 0.

    Happy polling. 😛

    By the way this new poll it like a TIP test paper.

  2. Yea, now all you have to do is hope that the majority chooses the same option.

    Otherwise, I’m afraid your answer won’t be counted as correct.

Comments are closed.